The Transplant Experience for Undocumented Immigrant Patients Formerly Receiving Emergency Dialysis and Caregivers.

Importance: Individuals of undocumented immigration status with kidney failure face barriers to receiving transplants due to lack of health insurance despite no regulatory barriers. Little is known about the perspectives on kidney transplant among individuals with undocumented immigration status with kidney failure who relied on emergency hemodialysis. Objective: To examine the overall experiences of transplant among transplant recipients of undocumented immigration status who previously relied on emergency hemodialysis and their family caregivers. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, semistructured 1-to-1 interviews were conducted with transplant recipients who had previously received emergency hemodialysis and transitioned to scheduled dialysis and their primary caregivers living in Denver, Colorado, between May 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023, in English or Spanish. Main Outcomes and Measures: Themes and subthemes regarding the experience of transplant as an undocumented immigrant previously receiving emergency hemodialysis were identified. Interview transcripts were translated, deidentified, and then analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: A total of 25 participants including 15 transplant recipients (5 [33.3%] female and 10 [66.7%] male; mean [SD] age, 49.5 [9.8] years) and 10 caregivers (7 [70.0%] female and 3 [30.0%] male; mean [SD] age, 44.5 [22.3] years) participated. Six themes were reported: limited kidney replacement therapy education while receiving emergency hemodialysis (lack of awareness of kidney disease and treatment options and discriminatory kidney replacement therapy education due to immigration status), hope for transplant once receiving scheduled dialysis (prospect of transplant through scheduled dialysis, family and quality of life as transplant motivators), transplant education and health insurance after transition to scheduled dialysis (inadequate transplant education in dialysis clinic, peer-to-peer transplant education, and peer-to-peer communication regarding availability of private health insurance), uncertainty during transplant evaluation (difficulty navigating the evaluation and wait-listing process, lack of communication regarding timeline, and concern for family limiting living donation), posttransplant improvements (ability to work after transplant is critically important given immigration status, autonomy with transplant improves mental health, and vigilance in maintaining transplant), and transplant facilitators (self-advocacy, spirituality and optimism, and peer support). Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study of transplant recipients of undocumented immigration status and their caregivers found that individuals formerly receiving emergency dialysis are excluded from education and access to transplant, and peer support throughout the transplant process helped with education and motivation to pursue transplant. These findings may be used to implement improvements in access to support and education for patients of undocumented immigration status with kidney failure, especially in areas where scheduled dialysis is not available.

Social and Behavioral Barriers to Effective Care During the Transition to End-Stage Kidney Care.

Individuals living with CKD are disproportionately burdened by a multitude of adverse clinical and person-centered outcomes. When patients transition from advanced kidney disease to kidney failure, the psychosocial effects as well as social determinants of health challenges are magnified, making this a particularly difficult time for patients beginning kidney replacement therapy. The key social determinants of health challenges often include food and housing insecurity, poverty, unreliable transportation, low level education and/or health literacy, lack of language interpreters and culturally concordant educational materials, lack of health care insurance coverage, and mistrust of the health care system. Psychosocial and physical stressors, such as depression, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, sleep difficulty, fatigue, and pain, are often part of the illness burden among individuals living with CKD and can interact synergistically with the social challenges making the transition to kidney replacement therapy particularly challenging. To better support patients during this time, it is critical that social and structural determinants of health as well as mental health be assessed and if needs are identified, that services be provided.

Challenging Health Inequities in Incarceration: a Call for Equitable Care for Kidney Disease and Hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current literature on care of hypertension and chronic kidney disease for people who are currently and formerly incarcerated, and to make recommendations for improving outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a growing body of literature describing care for kidney disease and hypertension for incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals that documents the provision of care itself, notably that many jails contract with private companies; the system is not designed to provide sustained, chronic disease care; and the transition from incarceration to community is fraught with gaps in care. However, deficiencies in data collection and regulation still limit our understanding of the quality of care provided in jails and prisons. Furthermore, more data is needed to understand the impact of structural racism in the criminal legal system on overall disparities in care for hypertension and kidney disease. Insurance coverage rates for people who were formerly incarcerated continue to be lower than the general population despite Medicaid expansion in many states. There is little recent data regarding kidney replacement therapy for this population despite known variation in dialysis modalities and transplant programs by state. Transitions clinics, which connect people who were formerly incarcerated with care in the community upon release, are growing and are important avenues by which to deliver care. People who are incarcerated are disproportionately affected by hypertension and kidney disease, yet data regarding the extent of these inequities and availability of quality care is lacking. More work is needed to understand the care of individuals with kidney disease and hypertension in prisons and to improve outcomes for these common chronic conditions. Both providing effective treatment of kidney disease and hypertension in prisons and jails and providing coordinated, quality transition to community care upon release represents an important opportunity for reform in care for a marginalized population.

Differences in Outcomes by Place of Origin among Hispanic Patients with Kidney Failure.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Hispanic patients are known to have a higher risk of kidney failure and lower rates of home dialysis use and kidney transplantation than non-Hispanic White patients. However, it is unknown whether these outcomes differ within the Hispanic community, which is heterogeneous in its members' places of origins. Using United States Renal Data System data, the authors found similar adjusted rates of home dialysis use for patients originating from places outside the United States and US-born Hispanic patients, whereas the adjusted risk of mortality and likelihood of transplantation differed depending on place (country or territory) of origin. Understanding the heterogeneity in kidney disease outcomes and treatment within the Hispanic community is crucial in designing interventions and implementation strategies to ensure that Hispanic individuals with kidney failure have equitable access to care. BACKGROUND: Compared with non-Hispanic White groups, Hispanic individuals have a higher risk of kidney failure yet lower rates of living donor transplantation and home dialysis. However, how home dialysis, mortality, and transplantation vary within the Hispanic community depending on patients' place of origin is unclear. METHODS: We identified adult Hispanic patients from the United States Renal Data System who initiated dialysis in 2009-2017. Primary exposure was country or territory of origin (the United States, Mexico, US-Puerto Rico, and other countries). We used logistic regression to estimate differences in odds of initiating home dialysis and competing risk models to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) of mortality and kidney transplantation. RESULTS: Of 137,039 patients, 44.4% were US-born, 30.9% were from Mexico, 12.9% were from US-Puerto Rico, and 11.8% were from other countries. Home dialysis rates were higher among US-born patients, but not significantly different after adjusting for demographic, medical, socioeconomic, and facility-level factors. Adjusted mortality risk was higher for individuals from US-Puerto Rico (SHR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.08) and lower for Mexico (SHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.81) and other countries (SHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.86) compared with US-born patients. The adjusted rate of transplantation for Mexican or US-Puerto Rican patients was similar to that of US-born patients but higher for those from other countries (SHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic people from different places of origin have similar adjusted rates of home dialysis but different adjusted rates of mortality and kidney transplantation. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these observed differences in outcomes.

Proceedings of a Workshop to Promote Community Health Worker Interventions in Nephrology.

ABSTRACT: Latinx populations face a higher burden of kidney failure and associated negative outcomes compared with non-Latinx White populations, despite sharing a similar prevalence of CKD. Community health worker (CHW) interventions have been shown to improve outcomes for Latinx individuals, but they are largely underutilized in kidney disease. We convened a workshop of four ongoing kidney disease CHW programs to identify successes, challenges, potential solutions, and needed research to promote CHW programs for Latinx individuals with kidney disease. Key points from the workshop and recommendations for intervention and research are highlighted. Facilitators of program success included prioritizing trust-building with participants, enabling participants to determine what aspects of the intervention were needed, providing participants with tools to help themselves and others after the intervention, and taking a trauma-informed approach to relationships. Challenges included persistent systemic barriers despite successful care navigation and low recruitment and retention. Research is needed to capture the effect of CHW interventions on outcomes and to determine how to implement CHW interventions for people with kidney disease nationwide.

Barriers and Facilitators to Home Dialysis Among Latinx Patients with Kidney Disease.

Importance: Latinx people have a high burden of kidney disease but are less likely to receive home dialysis compared to non-Latinx White people. The disparity in home dialysis therapy has not been completely explained by demographic, medical, or social factors. Objective: To understand the barriers and facilitators to home dialysis therapy experienced by Latinx individuals with kidney failure receiving home dialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with Latinx adults with kidney failure receiving home dialysis therapy in Denver, Colorado, and Houston, Texas, between November 2021 and March 2023. Patients were recruited from home dialysis clinics affiliated with academic medical centers. Of 39 individuals approached, 27 were included in the study. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Themes and subthemes regarding barriers and facilitators to home dialysis therapy. Results: A total of 27 Latinx adults (17 [63%] female and 10 [37%] male) with kidney failure who were receiving home dialysis participated. Themes and subthemes were identified, 3 related to challenges with home dialysis and 2 related to facilitators. Challenges to home dialysis included misinformation and immigration-related barriers to care (including cultural stigma of dialysis, misinformation regarding chronic disease care, and lack of health insurance due to immigration status), limited dialysis education (including lack of predialysis care, no-nephrologist education, and shared decision-making), and maintenance of home dialysis (including equipment issues, lifestyle restrictions, and anxiety about complications). Facilitators to home dialysis included improved lifestyle (including convenience, autonomy, physical symptoms, and dietary flexibility) and support (including family involvement, relationships with staff, self-efficacy, and language concordance). Conclusions and Relevance: Latinx participants in this study who were receiving home dialysis received misinformation and limited education regarding home dialysis, yet were engaged in self-advocacy and reported strong family and clinic support. These findings may inform new strategies aimed at improving access to home dialysis education and uptake for Latinx individuals with kidney disease.

Facilitating Medical Care for Latinx Individuals at Risk for CKD: A Pilot Intervention.

Rationale and Objective: Latinx individuals are at a higher risk for kidney failure than non-Latinx White individuals; however, they are less likely to receive pre-kidney failure medical care. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a community health worker (CHW) intervention that facilitated access to medical care for Latinx individuals. Study Design: Single-arm prospective study. Setting and Participants: Latinx adults were found to have albuminuria or risk factors for kidney disease at community screening events in Austin, Texas. Intervention: A 6-month CHW intervention that facilitated the following: (1) obtaining medical insurance; (2) medical care coordination with primary and nephrology care; (3) kidney disease education; and (4) connection with local resources to address health-related social needs. Outcomes: Recruitment, retention, medical care linkage, and participant and CHW-reported satisfaction with the intervention. Results: Of the 173 individuals who attended the 2 community screening events, 49 agreed to participate in the study, of whom, 51% were men with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 45 ± 14 years, and all self-identified as Mexican or Chicano. The mean ± SD estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 110 ± 21 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 41% of the participants reported a urine albumin-creatinine ratio of ≥30 mg/g. Among those enrolled, 28 of the 49 (57%) completed at least 1 CHW visit, and 20 of 49 (41%) completed the intervention. 7 individuals who needed assistance with insurance obtained insurance, and 15 of 20 (75%) scheduled an appointment with a primary care physician within 180 days. Participants reported that the US health care previously seemed inaccessible but gained insurance, the ability to navigate the system, and the ability to help others in their community to access medical care because of the program. Limitations: Small sample size and a single community may limit generalizability. Conclusions: We reported the acceptability of a CHW intervention. We encountered challenges with feasibility and identified strategies to overcome them. Studies are needed to test the effect of CHW interventions on outcomes and kidney health disparities. Funding: National Kidney Foundation young investigator research grant to Dr Novick. Plain Language Summary: Latinx individuals are at a higher risk for kidney failure than non-Latinx White individuals; however, they are less likely to receive pre-kidney failure medical care. We piloted a community health worker intervention that connected people with risk factors or showed evidence of kidney dysfunction at community screening events with medical care. Our findings indicate the acceptability of the intervention. We encountered challenges with feasibility and identified strategies to overcome them.

Assessment of a Peer Support Group Intervention for Undocumented Latinx Immigrants With Kidney Failure.

Importance: Most undocumented immigrants with kidney failure rely on emergency dialysis (defined as dialysis after a patient presents as critically ill) and experience significant depression and anxiety and high mortality. Culturally and language-concordant peer support group interventions may be associated with reduced depression and anxiety and may provide emotional support. Objective: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a single-group peer support group intervention. Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative and single-group prospective study for undocumented immigrants with kidney failure receiving emergency dialysis was conducted in Denver, Colorado, from December 2017 to July 2018. The 6-month intervention included peer support group meetings in the hospital while participants were hospitalized for emergency dialysis. Data were analyzed from March to June 2022. Main outcomes and measures: To assess feasibility, the recruitment, retention, implementation, and delivery for the intervention were tracked. To measure acceptability, interviews were conducted with participants using a structured format. To assess the value of the peer support group intervention, themes and subthemes were identified from interviews with participants and group meetings. Results: Of 27 undocumented immigrants with kidney failure receiving emergency dialysis, 23 participants (9 females [39.1%] and 14 males [60.9%]; mean [SD] age, 47 [8] years) agreed to participate (recruitment rate, 85.2%). Among them, 5 individuals withdrew and did not attend meetings and 18 participants (retention rate, 78.3%) attended a mean of 6 of 12 meetings (50.0%). From interviews and meetings, 3 themes, with associated subthemes, were identified: camaraderie and emotional support from peers (subthemes: peer support is vital for people newly diagnosed with kidney failure, safe space to build relationships and share hardship with peers, hospital setting for peer support is ideal, solidarity to survive and change policy, and sustainability of the peer support group), solutions to improve care and resilience (subthemes: self-advocacy, self-motivation and optimism, kidney disease education, emotional support from peers caregivers, and faith), and emotional and physical aspects of receiving emergency dialysis (subthemes: psychosocial and physical distress, mixed experiences with language-concordant care, emotional exhaustion from end-of-life conversations, and gratitude for clinicians). Conclusions and relevance: This study found that peer support group intervention achieved feasibility and acceptability. The findings suggest that a peer support group may be a patient-centered strategy to build camaraderie and provide emotional support in kidney failure, especially for socially marginalized uninsured populations who report limited English proficiency.

Nephrologists' perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on caring for patients undergoing dialysis in Latin America: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experiences of nephrologists on caring for patients undergoing in-centre haemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America. DESIGN: Twenty-five semistructured interviews were conducted by Zoom videoconference in English and Spanish languages during 2020 until data saturation. Using thematic analysis, we conducted line-by-line coding to inductively identify themes. SETTING: 25 centres across nine countries in Latin America. PARTICIPANTS: Nephrologists (17 male and 8 female) were purposively sampled to include diverse demographic characteristics and clinical experience. RESULTS: We identified five themes: shock and immediate mobilisation for preparedness (overwhelmed and distressed, expanding responsibilities to manage COVID-19 infection and united for workforce resilience); personal vulnerability (being infected with COVID-19 and fear of transmitting COVID-19 to family); infrastructural susceptibility of dialysis units (lacking resources and facilities for quarantine, struggling to prevent cross-contamination, and depletion of personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies); helplessness and moral distress (being forced to ration life-sustaining equipment and care, being concerned about delayed and shortened dialysis sessions, patient hesitancy to attend to dialysis sessions, being grieved by socioeconomic disparities, deterioration of patients with COVID-19, harms of isolation and inability to provide kidney replacement therapy); and fostering innovative delivery of care (expanding use of telehealth, increasing uptake of PD and shifting focus on preventing syndemics). CONCLUSION: Nephrologists felt personally and professionally vulnerable and reported feeling helpless and morally distressed because they doubted their capacity to provide safe care for patients undergoing dialysis. Better availability and mobilisation of resources and capacities to adapt models of care, including telehealth and home-based dialysis, are urgently needed.

Qualitative analysis of stakeholder perspectives on engaging Latinx patients in kidney-related research.

BACKGROUND: Latinx individuals are disproportionally burdened by kidney diseases compared to non-Latinx White individuals and are underrepresented in kidney-related research. We aimed to describe stakeholder perspectives on Latinx patient engagement in kidney-related research. METHODS: We conducted a thematic analysis of two online moderated discussions and an interactive online survey with open-text responses involving participants (i.e. stakeholders), with personal and/or professional experiences with Latinx patients with kidney diseases and their families/caregivers. RESULTS: Among the eight stakeholders (Female:75%; Latinx ethnicity:88%), there were three physicians, one nurse, one patient with kidney disease who received a kidney transplant, one policy maker, one Doctor of Philosophy, and one executive director of a non-profit health organization. We identified five themes. The majority of themes and their respective subthemes (in parentheses) reflected barriers to engagement: Lack of personal relevance (unable to relate to research staff and marketing resources, and unclear benefit of research to self, family, and community); fear and vulnerability (immigration concerns, stigma with seeking care, skepticism of Western medicine); logistical and financial barriers (limited opportunities to enroll in clinical trials, out-of-pocket costs, transportation issues); and distrust and asymmetry of power (related to limited English proficiency or health literacy, and provider bias). The last theme centered on stimulating interest and establishing trust in the research process. CONCLUSIONS: To overcome barriers to engagement in kidney-related research and establish trust among potential Latinx research participants, stakeholders recommended employing cultural responsiveness and community-based strategies. These strategies can help identify local health priorities, enhance research recruitment and retention strategies, and establish partnerships that continue to elevate research endeavors aiming to enhance the health of Latinx individuals with kidney diseases.

Barriers in Healthcare for Latinx Patients with Limited English Proficiency-a Narrative Review.

Latinx (includes Hispanics and is the non-gendered term for Latino/Latina which is a person of Latin American origin or descent) constitutes the largest racial and ethnic minority group in the United States (US). Many members of this group report limited English proficiency, experience discrimination, feel distrust in the healthcare setting, and face poorer health outcomes than non-Latinx Whites. As healthcare systems assess internal structures of care, understanding the experiences of Latinx patients may inform strategies to improve care. This narrative review describes studies that assessed the experiences of Latinx patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) in the inpatient and outpatient settings in the US. We searched PubMed for studies published between January 1, 1990, and March 2021. We reviewed all citations and available abstracts (n = 429). We classified study titles (n = 156) as warranting detailed consideration of the original article. Limited English proficiency is a well-documented challenge reported by Latinx patients seeking care in the outpatient setting, resulting in mistrust of healthcare organizations and clinicians. The effects of LEP overlap substantially with challenges related to patients' immigration status, cultural traditions, and socioeconomic needs. Use of professional interpretation rather than ad hoc interpretation improves trust and satisfaction. There is no consensus about the most effective mode of delivering professional interpretation (in person, telephonic, video conferencing), although rapid simultaneous telephone translation is a promising modality. Increasing awareness of the barriers to effective communication, improving skills in communicating through translators, and increasing the amount of time spent with patients may improve communication and trust more than structural changes like mode of translation or bedside rounding. Cultural fluency training, standardized language training for providers, and incentive pay for fluency are also deserving of further consideration.

A Model of Advocacy to Inform Action.

The need for effective advocacy on the part of health professionals has never been greater. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has made the connection between human health and social conditions clear, while highlighting the limitations of biomedical interventions to address those conditions. Efforts to increase the frequency and effectiveness of advocacy activities by health professionals have been hampered by the lack of a practical framework to define and develop advocacy competencies among trainees as well as to plan and execute advocacy activities. The authors of this article propose a framework which defines advocacy as occurring across three domains of influence (practice, community, and government) using three categories of advocacy skills (policy, communication, and relationships). When these skills are successfully applied in the appropriate domains of influence, the resulting change falls into three levels: individual, adjacent, and structural. The authors assert that this framework is immediately applicable to a broad variety of health professionals, educators, researchers, organizations, and professional societies as they individually and collectively seek to improve the health and well-being of those they care for.

Sources of Clinician Burnout in Providing Care for Underserved Patients in a Safety-Net Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND: Burnout among clinicians is common and can undermine quality of care, patient outcomes, and workforce preservation, but sources of burnout or protective factors unique to clinicians working in safety-net settings are less well understood. Understanding these clinician experiences may inform interventions to reduce burnout. OBJECTIVE: To describe clinician perspectives on sources of burnout in a safety-net healthcare system. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians from multiple disciplines who provided care at a safety-net healthcare system from October 2018 to January 2019. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Forty clinicians (25 female and 15 male; mean [SD] age, 41 [9.1]) participated, including physicians, social workers, advanced practice providers, nurses, psychologists, physical and occupational therapists, and other healthcare professionals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Themes and subthemes that reflected clinician experiences, burnout, and workload expectations. KEY RESULTS: Five themes emerged: limited resources (entrenched social injustices, brokenness of the US healthcare system, precarious discharge options, and "revolving door" readmissions), barriers to building trust with patients (chasm of communication, addressing fear and mistrust, and being exposed to threats), administrative requirements (criticism hampering meaningful care, assuming extra workloads, bureaucratic burden), compassion fatigue (confronting traumatic situations, persistent worry about patient safety and welfare, witnessing mistreatment and stigmatization, overextending and overinvesting, withdrawing and shutting down, blaming self and career crisis), and advocacy as a counterbalance to burnout (solidarity when helping underserved communities, fervent advocacy, and patient gratitude). CONCLUSIONS: Among clinicians who provide care in a safety-net healthcare system, sources of burnout included limited resources, barriers to building trust with patients, administrative requirements, and compassion fatigue, but clinicians remained driven by their desire to advocate for patients. Policy-level interventions which increase funding to safety-net healthcare systems to bolster existing resources and staffing, create peer-support and wellness programs, and support advocacy efforts may mitigate burnout.

Designing Interventions Addressing Structural Racism to Reduce Kidney Health Disparities: A Report from an NIDDK Workshop.

Structural racism embodies the many ways in which society fosters racial discrimination through "mutually reinforcing inequitable systems" that limit access to resources and opportunities that can promote health and well-being among marginalized communities. To achieve health equity, and kidney health equity more specifically, structural racism must be eliminated. In February 2022, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) convened the "Designing Interventions that Address Structural Racism to Reduce Kidney Health Disparities" workshop which was aimed at describing the mechanisms through which structural racism contributes to health and healthcare disparities for people along the continuum of kidney disease; and identifying actionable opportunities for interventional research focused on dismantling or addressing the effects of structural racism. Participants identified six domains as key targets for interventions and future research: 1) apply an anti-racism lens, 2) promote structural interventions, 3) target multiple levels, 4) promote effective community and stakeholder engagement, 5) improve data collection, and 6) advance health equity through new healthcare models. There exists an urgent need for research to develop, implement and evaluate interventions that address the unjust systems, policies, and laws that generate and perpetuate inequities in kidney health.